Link Love: 8.9.12

link love

link love


Alex Box for Rankin.


• Why is everyone on the internet so angry? These days, online comments “are extraordinarily aggressive, without resolving anything…at the end of it you can’t possibly feel like anybody heard you. Having a strong emotional experience that doesn’t resolve itself in any healthy way can’t be a good thing.”

• I’m so sad to hear that legendary fashion icon Anna Piaggi has died. Her colorful style will be missed.

• I love a good set of Photoshop brushes and Breanna Rose has gathered up a great selection of faux watercolor ones. Score!

• Emily Henderson shares 15 do’s and don’t's when trying to get an internship (and keep it)!

• The New York Times weighs in on our preoccupation with Pinterest, Tumblr and the trouble with curation.

• I’ve enjoyed reading how Makeshift Society is coming together. It’s a private clubhouse in San Francisco where creative folks can mingle, take classes and get work done. I wish there was a branch in Portland!

• So funny! What if every Olympic sport was photographed like beach volleyball?

• I love the thought of buying new experiences, not things. Some of my all-time best memories revolve around trips I’ve taken.

• Here’s a fun project: learn how to make a handwritten D.I.Y. poster.

11 Responses to Link Love: 8.9.12

  1. Tara says:

    I saw your comment about the Makeshift Society and it triggered something in my brain. I was watching Oregon Art Beat on OPB and there is a place called Shop People there in Portland. Here is the link – http://shoppeople.org/. While not exactly the same animal, it seemed like the hand’s on creative side of you might enjoy this sort of place. If you already know of it, I apologize, but it seemed too interesting not to mention on the off-chance you hadn’t.

  2. Alex says:

    Thanks for posting the NYT article on Pinterest/tumblr/”curation.”
    The more time I spend on Pinterest, which admittedly is increasing by the day, I can’t help but think- despite following more and more people/boards, the pins are all relatively incestuous- it’s not at all uncommon to see the same item 2 or 3 times within a short scroll of one another. Is this narrow vision stunting our stylistic growth?

    • Nubby says:

      Alex: Totally valid point. I think all of us are beginning to wonder what all this time “curating” is leading to…because the more time we curate, the less time we have to create and live in the present.

  3. Ana says:

    On the whole curation issue, I agree with the highlighted comment on that article (JS, upstate).

    The whole recent… well, I wouldn’t say drama, but something… around curating smells a bit like somebody is feeling insecure because what was once exclusive (and his, all his!), attainable only by the, in some way, privileged is getting democratized now.
    Haven’t seen that before.

    Oh, I cannot agree that curation is (only) about imagined/hoped for possession.

    Nor can I agree that only the curation in the museums is thought-provoking.

    … What? Where do these extremely one-sided views come from?

    *

    The volleyball-like pictures are great :D .

    *

    The new experiences vs. new things ties well to my remark that curation is not about imagined possession: curators don’t necessarily need the things they feature, they just want to experience them and share that with others.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Please note: Any comments deemed inappropriate (spam, off-topic, rude language) will be removed.